Abstract
Ethical implications of neuroenhacement are discussed. In particular, possible advantages the participants of a research study can benefit from are taken into account. Even though the study is aimed at empowering participants' skills in a given domain, the researchers have to pay attention to the effects that the intervention can produce on self-conceptions, since the belief that improvements are generated only by external factors rather than personal engagement might be indirectly elicited.
| Translated title of the contribution | [Autom. eng. transl.] Who decides what is best for research subjects? [Who decides what is better for the participants involved in a research study?] |
|---|---|
| Original language | Italian |
| Pages (from-to) | 267-269 |
| Number of pages | 3 |
| Journal | Psicologia Clinica dello Sviluppo |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2021 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Clinical Psychology
Keywords
- Enhancement
- Neuroenhancement
- Transcranic electrical stimulation (tES)
- Vulnerability
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of '[Autom. eng. transl.] Who decides what is best for research subjects? [Who decides what is better for the participants involved in a research study?]'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver