Cass., sez. IV pen., 24 gennaio 2013, n. 11493

Translated title of the contribution: [Autom. eng. transl.] Court of Cassation, section IV pen., 24 January 2013, n. 11493

Fabio Gino Seregni

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

[Autom. eng. transl.] In the pronouncement of the Supreme Court under consideration, the responsibility of the defendant is to be found in the violation of the duty of care which required him to carry out his activity according to his model of agent and in compliance with the rules of prudence, the violation of which led to premises of the lethal event. The application of the guidelines that concern and contain only rules of expertise and do not refer to negligence and imprudence profiles cannot be usefully evoked. The guidelines to be relevant in ascertaining the responsibility of the physician must indicate diagnostic-therapeutic standards in compliance with the rules dictated by the best medical science to guarantee the health of the patient and (as mentioned) must not be inspired by exclusive logic of economic management, in terms of cost containment, in contrast to the patient's care needs.
Translated title of the contribution[Autom. eng. transl.] Court of Cassation, section IV pen., 24 January 2013, n. 11493
Original languageItalian
Pages (from-to)963-980
Number of pages18
JournalRIVISTA ITALIANA DI MEDICINA LEGALE
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Keywords

  • ELEMENTO SOGGETTIVO DEL REATO - VIOLAZIONE DELLE REGOLE DI DILIGENZA - RISPETTO DELLE LINEE GUIDA - CONDIZIONI DI APPLICABILITA'
  • RESPONSABILITA' MEDICA - OMESSO CONTROLLO DEI TRACCIATI - VIOLAZIONE DEL DOVERE DI DILIGENZA - MORTE DEL FETO - OMICIDIO COLPOSO SUSSISTENZA

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '[Autom. eng. transl.] Court of Cassation, section IV pen., 24 January 2013, n. 11493'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this