Caspofungin activity against clinical isolates of azole cross-resistant Candida glabrata overexpressing efflux pump genes

Brunella Posteraro, Maurizio Sanguinetti, Barbara Fiori, Marilena La Sorda, Teresa Spanu, Dominique Sanglard, Giovanni Fadda

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Several studies have documented the potent in vitro activity of caspofungin against Candida spp. This is of special concern for Candida glabrata infections that are often resistant to many azole antifungal agents and, consequently, difficult to treat. The aim of the present study was to expand the data on the in vitro activity of caspofungin against azole-resistant isolates of C. glabrata. METHODS: A total of 50 clinical isolates of C. glabrata were tested for susceptibility to caspofungin. The isolates were cross-resistant to multiple azoles, including fluconazole, itraconazole, ketoconazole and voriconazole. Expression of the resistance-related CgCDR1 and CgCDR2 genes was evaluated by quantitative RT-PCR analysis. The MICs of caspofungin were determined by using the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards M27-A2 reference method. RESULTS: C. glabrata isolates exhibited increased expression of the CDR efflux pump(s), and this was in accordance with their high-level azole resistance. In contrast, all the isolates were highly susceptible to caspofungin (100% of isolates were inhibited at <or=1 mg/L). CONCLUSIONS: Our results represent further evidence for the excellent antifungal potency of caspofungin, particularly against C. glabrata isolates expressing cross-resistance to azoles
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)458-461
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
Publication statusPublished - 2006

Keywords

  • candida glabrata
  • caspofungin

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Caspofungin activity against clinical isolates of azole cross-resistant Candida glabrata overexpressing efflux pump genes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this