TY - JOUR
T1 - Built-in challenges within the supervisory architecture of the Eurozone
AU - Philippas, Dionisis
AU - Dragomirescu-Gaina, Catalin-Florinel
AU - Leontitsis, Alexandros
AU - Papadamou, Stephanos
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - We analyse a sample of significant European financial intermediaries that fall under the Single Supervisory Mechanism, which is part of the existing institutional supervisory architecture of the Eurozone. Theory suggests that herding among financial intermediaries raises cross-sectional correlations and has negative implications for systemic risk. Empirically, herding behaviours are associated with clusters identifying commonalities in asset allocations and risk strategies. By adopting a novel clustering approach, we analyse whether some pre-determined classifications and criteria associated with the current supervisory framework can capture financial intermediaries’ herding behaviour. We find that simple classifications and criteria, which are less likely to be policy-biased, can be more efficient than complex ones when it comes to identifying commonalities posing the highest threats to systemic risk. The findings confirm the need for a macro- rather than micro-prudential approach to financial supervision by highlighting the importance of using a supervisory toolkit that includes indicators with a stronger cross-sectional and network dimension. Our methodology can serve as a final consistency check for quantitative-based classifications and criteria employed by supervisory authorities.
AB - We analyse a sample of significant European financial intermediaries that fall under the Single Supervisory Mechanism, which is part of the existing institutional supervisory architecture of the Eurozone. Theory suggests that herding among financial intermediaries raises cross-sectional correlations and has negative implications for systemic risk. Empirically, herding behaviours are associated with clusters identifying commonalities in asset allocations and risk strategies. By adopting a novel clustering approach, we analyse whether some pre-determined classifications and criteria associated with the current supervisory framework can capture financial intermediaries’ herding behaviour. We find that simple classifications and criteria, which are less likely to be policy-biased, can be more efficient than complex ones when it comes to identifying commonalities posing the highest threats to systemic risk. The findings confirm the need for a macro- rather than micro-prudential approach to financial supervision by highlighting the importance of using a supervisory toolkit that includes indicators with a stronger cross-sectional and network dimension. Our methodology can serve as a final consistency check for quantitative-based classifications and criteria employed by supervisory authorities.
KW - Clustering analysis
KW - European Single Supervisory Mechanism
KW - Financial network
KW - Mixture model
KW - Clustering analysis
KW - European Single Supervisory Mechanism
KW - Financial network
KW - Mixture model
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10807/227747
U2 - 10.1057/s41261-021-00183-z
DO - 10.1057/s41261-021-00183-z
M3 - Article
SN - 1745-6452
VL - 24
SP - 15
EP - 39
JO - Journal of Banking Regulation
JF - Journal of Banking Regulation
ER -