Abstract
A normative framework\r\nfor a viable vision of IoT requires\r\na renewed proactive attention —\r\nand moral commitment — towards\r\nhuman agency, namely towards\r\na full concept of humanness and\r\ntowards preserving the features of\r\nhuman action. The preservation and cultivation\r\nof human agency in IoT is especially\r\nat stake as the embedded (and often\r\nembodied) pervasiveness, miniaturization,\r\ndistributed, and networked character\r\nof connections can impair the\r\nhuman ability to control the system\r\nwhile being a part of it.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 73-80 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | IEEE Technology and Society Magazine |
| Volume | 33 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2014 |
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- General Engineering
- General Social Sciences
Keywords
- Human Agency
- Internet of Things
- Rights in design
- Trust
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Building Trust in the Human– Internet of Things Relationship'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver