Bone substitutes in orthopaedic surgery: from basic science to clinical practice

Wanda Lattanzi, Giuseppe Milano, Ernesto Damiano Pagano, Marta Barba, Giampiero Salonna, Giandomenico Logroscino

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

469 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Bone substitutes are being increasingly used in surgery as over two millions bone grafting procedures are performed worldwide per year. Autografts still represent the gold standard for bone substitution, though the morbidity and the inherent limited availability are the main limitations. Allografts, i.e. banked bone, are osteoconductive and weakly osteoinductive, though there are still concerns about the residual infective risks, costs and donor availability issues. As an alternative, xenograft substitutes are cheap, but their use provided contrasting results, so far. Ceramic-based synthetic bone substitutes are alternatively based on hydroxyapatite (HA) and tricalcium phosphates, and are widely used in the clinical practice. Indeed, despite being completely resorbable and weaker than cortical bone, they have exhaustively proved to be effective. Biomimetic HAs are the evolution of traditional HA and contains ions (carbonates, Si, Sr, Fl, Mg) that mimic natural HA (biomimetic HA). Injectable cements represent another evolution, enabling mininvasive techniques. Bone morphogenetic proteins (namely BMP2 and 7) are the only bone inducing growth factors approved for human use in spine surgery and for the treatment of tibial nonunion. Demineralized bone matrix and platelet rich plasma did not prove to be effective and their use as bone substitutes remains controversial. Experimental cell-based approaches are considered the best suitable emerging strategies in several regenerative medicine application, including bone regeneration. In some cases, cells have been used as bioactive vehicles delivering osteoinductive genes locally to achieve bone regeneration. In particular, mesenchymal stem cells have been widely exploited for this purpose, being multipotent cells capable of efficient osteogenic potential. Here we intend to review and update the alternative available techniques used for bone fusion, along with some hints on the advancements achieved through the experimental research in this field.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2445-2461
Number of pages17
JournalJOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE. MATERIALS IN MEDICINE
Volume25
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Keywords

  • bone grafting
  • bone substitutes
  • hydroxyapatite
  • regenerative medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Bone substitutes in orthopaedic surgery: from basic science to clinical practice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this