Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Biomarker characterization in endometrial cancer in Europe: first survey data analysis from 69 pathological academic and hospital labs

  • Angela Santoro
  • , Emma Bragantini
  • , Francesca Castiglione
  • , Raji Ganesan
  • , Xavier Matias-Guiu
  • , Milo Frattini
  • , Valerio Gallotta
  • , Pablo Garcia
  • , Yatish Pattni
  • , Julia Tsiampali-Laprell
  • , Brigitte Bisaro
  • , Mattia Barbareschi
  • , Gian Franco Zannoni*
  • *Corresponding author
  • Ospedale S. Chiara
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Careggi
  • Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust
  • Biomedical Research Institute of Lleida
  • Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC)
  • Diaceutics PLC

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

Abstract

Introduction. Endometrial carcinoma (EC) is the commonest gynecological cancer affecting women in Western populations. To predict patient risk, the 2020 edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Tumors of the Female Genital Tract stressed the importance of integrated histo-molecular classification of the disease. This survey analysis poses attention on the most frequently used immunohistochemical and molecular markers adopted in daily categorization of ECs in European laboratories. Methods. We analyzed data collected through questionnaires administered to 40 Italian, 20 Spanish, 3 Swiss and 6 United Kingdom (UK) laboratories. We collected information regarding daily practice in EC evaluation, specifically concerning mismatch repair status (MMR) and microsatellite instability (MSI). Summary and descriptive statistical analyses were carried out to evaluate the current practice of each laboratory. Results. The results show that MMR status is mainly evaluated by using immunohistochemistry (IHC) on most EC samples. The most frequent approach for the analysis of MMR status is IHC of four proteins (PMS2, MSH6, MSH2, MLH1). MSI analysis by molecular methods is uncommon but useful as a supplemental tool in specific conditions. MLH1 promoter hypermethylation and BRAF V600 mutations analysis are performed in case of negative expression of MLH1/PMS2. Other markers (mainly p53 followed by POLE and PTEN) are investigated in particular in Spain and Switzerland in a consistent number of cases. Conclusion. Guidelines consultation and standardization of laboratory procedures are efficient means for EC prognostic risk stratification and improving the quality of care.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)32-45
Number of pages14
JournalPathologica
Volume116
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • General Medicine

Keywords

  • European Survey
  • biomarkers testing
  • endometrial cancer
  • risk stratification

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Biomarker characterization in endometrial cancer in Europe: first survey data analysis from 69 pathological academic and hospital labs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this