Abstract
[Autom. eng. transl.] The decision about access or suspension of dialysis treatment in patients with chronic renal failure (CRL) currently revolves around the recognition of those patients for whom it is not indicated. Therefore, the initial question according to which it was necessary to ensure treatment to all the many patients who could have benefited from it, has been alternated by an opposite problem: to identify, among the many candidates for dialysis, those who would not obtain an appreciable benefit. Where, in fact, the treatment is not capable of offering the expected medical benefits, configuring a true and proper medical futility or, where the weight imposed by the treatment (side effects, complications, etc.) exceeds the benefits that this is capable of offering the patient, it is ethically appropriate not to start (or eventually suspend) the treatment itself.
| Translated title of the contribution | [Autom. eng. transl.] Clinical bioethics. Guidelines on the initiation and suspension of hemodialysis treatment |
|---|---|
| Original language | Spanish |
| Pages (from-to) | 135-163 |
| Number of pages | 29 |
| Journal | MEDICINA Y ÉTICA:REVISTA INTERNACIONAL DE BIOÉTICA, DEONTOLOGÍA Y ÉTICA MÉDICA |
| Publication status | Published - 2013 |
Keywords
- hemodiálisis
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of '[Autom. eng. transl.] Clinical bioethics. Guidelines on the initiation and suspension of hemodialysis treatment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver