Abstract
The legal view of science has changed through time, moving from a more positivist and noncritical position of law towards science to a critical view of science – providing the potential for more objective knowledge, but value-laden as well - and of the role of society. This paper explores some judicial cases that illustrate these attitudes, suggesting that reference to science (particularly to EBM) can be rigourously and equitably made when it serves the cause of transparency and democratisation both in science and in law, as the tendency towards a policy-related science is suggesting.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Evidence-based Practice in Medicine and Health Care |
| Editors | R. Ter Meulen, N. Biller, Ch. Lenk, R. Lie |
| Pages | 25-33 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2005 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- policy-related science
- regulatory science
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Beyond Legitimate Science: The Case for Policy-related Science'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver