Beni giuridici e generazione della vita. Note alla luce di alcune vicende giudiziarie europee

Translated title of the contribution: [Autom. eng. transl.] Legal assets and life generation. Notes in the light of some European judicial events

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

[Autom. eng. transl.] The contribution is inspired by the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (Grande Chambre) 18 October 2011, which recognizes in the continuous existential sequence that begins with fertilization (or possibly with other modalities) the criterion of legal relevance of the human embryo (confirming the invalidity of a patent concerning progenitor cells obtained from human embryonic stem cells), and from the ruling of the European Court of Human Rights (Grande Chambre) November 3, 2011, which considers a state discipline of inadmissibility of in vitro heterologous fecundazone: this in order to reflect on the role of the good constituted by human life in the democratic order and on the configuration of an avoidable, new sphere of reflection also juridical-penal, represented by the criteria that must govern human generation.
Translated title of the contribution[Autom. eng. transl.] Legal assets and life generation. Notes in the light of some European judicial events
Original languageItalian
Pages (from-to)523-533
Number of pages11
JournalCRIMINALIA
Volume6
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Keywords

  • criteri di generazione della vita umana
  • statuto giuridico dell'embrione umano

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '[Autom. eng. transl.] Legal assets and life generation. Notes in the light of some European judicial events'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this