Assertions and Hypotheses: A Logical Framework for Their Opposition Relations

Daniele Chiffi, Massimiliano Carrara, Ciro De Florio

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)


Following the speech act theory, we take hypotheses and assertions as linguistic acts with different illocutionary forces. We assume that a hypothesis is justified if there is at least a scintilla of evidence for the truth of its propositional content, while an assertion is justified when there is conclusive evidence that its propositional content is true. Here we extend the logical treatment for assertions given by Dalla Pozza and Garola (1995, Erkenntnis, 43, 81–109) by outlining a pragmatic logic for assertions and hypotheses. On the basis of this extension we analyse the standard logical opposition relations for assertions and hypotheses. We formulate a pragmatic square of oppositions for assertions and a hexagon of oppositions for hypotheses. Finally, we give a mixed hexagon of oppositions to point out the opposition relations for assertions and hypotheses
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)N/A-N/A
JournalLogic Journal of the IGPL
Publication statusPublished - 2016


  • Logic for pragmatics


Dive into the research topics of 'Assertions and Hypotheses: A Logical Framework for Their Opposition Relations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this