Aristotelian universals, strong immanence, and construction

Damiano Costa, Alessandro Giordani

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The Aristotelian view of universals, according to which each universal generically depends for its existence on its instantiations, has recently come under attack by a series of ground-theoretic arguments. The last such arguments, presented by Raven, promises to offer several significant improvements over its predecessors, such as avoiding commitment to the transitivity of ground and offering new reasons for the metaphysical priority of universals over their instantiations. In this paper, we argue that Raven’s argument does not effectively avoid said commitment and that Raven’s new reasons fail. Moreover, we present a novel ground-theoretic interpretation of the Aristotelian view, referred to as strong immanence, and introduce a new argument against the Aristotelian view, intended to sidestep any commitment to the transitivity of ground.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-15
Number of pages15
JournalSynthese
Volume203
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024

Keywords

  • Dependence
  • Grounding
  • Immanence
  • States of affairs
  • Universals

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Aristotelian universals, strong immanence, and construction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this