Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Appunti di filosofia della legislazione animale

Translated title of the contribution: [Autom. eng. transl.] Notes on the philosophy of animal legislation

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

[Autom. eng. transl.] The philosophies that deal with the treatment of animals do not represent a united front: utilitarianism and rights theory, which are profoundly different from each other, appear to have in common the affirmation of "rights" for animals; on the contrary, animal welfare maintains that animals are recipients of duties by human beings, who must guarantee them a good quality of life. In the Anglo-Saxon debate, which was at the origin of the renewed philosophical and practical interest in animals, the term rightism alludes to the theories that, directly recognizing animals as holders of "rights", take a stand against any form of exploitation of animals; while the term welfarism indicates the positions that, affirming that animals must be treated humanely, maintain that they can be used where this condition is satisfied.
Translated title of the contribution[Autom. eng. transl.] Notes on the philosophy of animal legislation
Original languageItalian
Title of host publicationPer un codice degli animali. Commentario critico della legislazione vigente
EditorsA. Mannucci M. Tallacchini
Pages33-44
Number of pages12
Publication statusPublished - 2001

Keywords

  • Animali
  • Animal welfare e diritti animali
  • Legislazione

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '[Autom. eng. transl.] Notes on the philosophy of animal legislation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this