Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A Real-World Multicentre Retrospective Study of Paclitaxel-Bevacizumab and Maintenance Therapy as First-Line for HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer

  • T. Gamucci
  • , L. Mentuccia
  • , C. Natoli
  • , I. Sperduti
  • , Alessandra Cassano
  • , A. Michelotti
  • , Lauro L. Di
  • , D. Sergi
  • , A. Fabi
  • , M. G. Sarobba
  • , P. Marchetti
  • , M. Barba
  • , E. Magnolfi
  • , M. Maugeri-Sacca
  • , E. Rossi
  • , V. Sini
  • , A. Grassadonia
  • , D. Pellegrini
  • , A. Astone
  • , C. Nistico
  • F. Angelini, A. Vaccaro, A. Pellegrino, Angelis C. De, M. Palleschi, L. Moscetti, I. Bertolini, S. Buglioni, A. Giordano, L. Pizzuti*, P. Vici
*Corresponding author
  • Medical Oncology Unit
  • Centro Scienze dell'Invecchiamento e Medicina Traslazionale -CeSI-MeT
  • IRCCS Istituti fisioterapici ospitalieri - Istituto Regina Elena
  • University Hospital of Pisa
  • Sant'Andrea Hospital
  • Ospedale Regina Apostolorum
  • Fatebenefratelli Hospital
  • Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico Umberto I
  • University of Modena and Reggio Emilia
  • Ospedale di Belcolle - Viterbo
  • Temple University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Bevacizumab in combination with taxanes in HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients has shown improved progression-free survival (PFS), despite the lack of clear overall survival (OS) benefit. We performed a retrospective analysis to evaluate the impact of paclitaxel-bevacizumab and of maintenance therapy with bevacizumab (BM) and endocrine therapy (ET) in the real-world practice. We identified 314 HER2-negative MBC patients treated in 12 cancer centers. Overall, the median PFS and OS were 14 and 40 months, respectively. Among the 254 patients potentially eligible for BM, 183 received BM after paclitaxel discontinuation until progression/toxicity. PFS and OS were improved in patients who had received BM in comparison with those potentially eligible but who did not receive BM (P< 0.0001 and P = 0.001, respectively). Results were confirmed when adjusting for propensity score. Among the 216 hormone-receptor positive patients eligible for BM, a more favorable PFS and OS were observed when maintenance ET was administered (P < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis showed that PS, BM, number of disease sites and maintenance ET were related to PFS, while response and maintenance ET were related to OS. In hormone-receptor positive patients, BM produced a significant PFS and a trend towards OS benefit only in absence of maintenance ET (P = 0.0007 and P = 0.06, respectively). In the triple-negative subgroup, we observed a trend towards a better OS for patients who received BM (P = 0.06), without differences in PFS (P = 0.21). Our results confirmed the efficacy of first-line paclitaxel-bevacizumab in real-world practice; both BM and maintenance ET significantly improved PFS and OS compared to no maintenance therapies. J. Cell. Physiol. 232: 1571–1578, 2017. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1571-1578
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Cellular Physiology
Volume232
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Physiology
  • Clinical Biochemistry
  • Cell Biology

Keywords

  • 80 and over
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Bevacizumab
  • Breast Neoplasms
  • Disease-Free Survival
  • ErbB-2
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Maintenance Chemotherapy
  • Middle Aged
  • Multivariate Analysis
  • Neoplasm Metastasis
  • Paclitaxel
  • Proportional Hazards Models
  • Receptor
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Treatment Outcome

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A Real-World Multicentre Retrospective Study of Paclitaxel-Bevacizumab and Maintenance Therapy as First-Line for HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this