A few counter-factual hypotheses on the current economic crisis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The economic and financial problems of the present devastating crisis are terribly practical. Sraffa’s little book is highly theoretical. To relate the two we must avoid stopping at Keynes, and include the whole group of economists around him in Cambridge, resuming the discussions that have been pushed into oblivion by the mainstream. The capital theory controversy was not the only one. Here, more relevant is the controversy on growth, income distribution, savings and profits between Samuelson–Modigliani and Kaldor–Pasinetti. As a result, a theorem, associated with Modigliani–Miller, was brought to fame and hailed as ‘the core of modern corporate finance’. Its surprisingly wide acceptance is here harshly criticised and indicted of major responsibility for the present crisis. Inevitably, this is argued through counter-factual hypotheses. Yet, even with less sophisticated analytical tools, a framework does exist, much nearer to common sense, implying the needed flexibility and openness of mind for the major restructuring of financial institutions, which today so clearly emerges as the major task to undertake.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1433-1453
Number of pages21
JournalCambridge Journal of Economics
Volume36
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Keywords

  • Growth and distribution theories
  • Modigliani-Miller Theorem
  • alternative views on the foundations of economic theory
  • corporate dividend policies
  • current crisis of capitalist economies

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A few counter-factual hypotheses on the current economic crisis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this