A direct comparison of the sensitivity of CT and MR cardiac perfusion using a myocardial perfusion phantom

James Otton, Geraint Morton, Andreas Schuster, Boris Bigalke, Riccardo Marano, Luca Olivotti, Eike Nagel, Amedeo Chiribiri

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Direct comparison of CT and magnetic resonance (MR) perfusion techniques has been limited and in vivo assessment is affected by physiological variability, timing of image acquisition, and parameter selection.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)117-124
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography
Volume7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Keywords

  • Coronary Angiography
  • Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted
  • Magnetic Resonance Angiography
  • Myocardial Perfusion Imaging
  • Phantoms, Imaging
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A direct comparison of the sensitivity of CT and MR cardiac perfusion using a myocardial perfusion phantom'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this