TY - JOUR
T1 - 1L- vs. 4L-Polyethylene glycol for bowel preparation before colonoscopy among inpatients: A propensity score-matching analysis
AU - Frazzoni, Leonardo
AU - Spada, Cristiano
AU - Radaelli, Franco
AU - Mussetto, Alessandro
AU - Laterza, Liboria
AU - Laterza, Lucrezia
AU - La Marca, Marina
AU - Piccirelli, Stefania
AU - Cortellini, Fabio
AU - Rondonotti, Emanuele
AU - Paci, Valentina
AU - Bazzoli, Franco
AU - Fabbri, Carlo
AU - Manno, Mauro
AU - Aragona, Giovanni
AU - Manes, Gianpiero
AU - Occhipinti, Pietro
AU - Cadoni, Sergio
AU - Zagari, Rocco Maurizio
AU - Hassan, Cesare
AU - Fuccio, Lorenzo
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Background: Inpatients are at risk for inadequate colon cleansing. Experts recommend 4L-polyethylene-glycol (PEG) solution. A higher colon cleansing adequacy rate for a hyperosmolar 1L-PEG plus ascorbate prep has been recently reported. Aims: We aimed to determine whether 1L-PEG outperforms 4L-PEG among inpatients. Methods: post-hoc analysis of a large Italian multicenter prospective observational study among inpatients (QIPS study). We performed a propensity score matching between 1L-PEG and 4L-PEG group. The primary outcome was the rate of adequate colon cleansing as assessed by unblinded endoscopists through Boston scale. Secondary outcome was the safety profile. Results: Among 1,004 patients undergoing colonoscopy, 724 (72%) were prescribed 4L-PEG and 280 (28%) 1L-PEG. The overall adequate colon cleansing rate was 69.2% (n = 695). We matched 274 pairs of patients with similar distribution of confounders. The rate of patients with adequate colon cleansing was higher in 1L-PEG than in 4L-PEG group (84.3% vs. 77.4%, p = 0.039). No different shift in serum concentration of electrolytes (namely Na+, K+, Ca2+), creatinine and hematocrit were observed for both preparations. Conclusion: We found a higher rate of adequate colon cleansing for colonoscopy with the 1L-PEG bowel prep vs. 4L-PEG, with apparent similar safety profile, among inpatients. A confirmatory randomized trial is needed. (ClinicalTrials.gov no: NCT04310332)
AB - Background: Inpatients are at risk for inadequate colon cleansing. Experts recommend 4L-polyethylene-glycol (PEG) solution. A higher colon cleansing adequacy rate for a hyperosmolar 1L-PEG plus ascorbate prep has been recently reported. Aims: We aimed to determine whether 1L-PEG outperforms 4L-PEG among inpatients. Methods: post-hoc analysis of a large Italian multicenter prospective observational study among inpatients (QIPS study). We performed a propensity score matching between 1L-PEG and 4L-PEG group. The primary outcome was the rate of adequate colon cleansing as assessed by unblinded endoscopists through Boston scale. Secondary outcome was the safety profile. Results: Among 1,004 patients undergoing colonoscopy, 724 (72%) were prescribed 4L-PEG and 280 (28%) 1L-PEG. The overall adequate colon cleansing rate was 69.2% (n = 695). We matched 274 pairs of patients with similar distribution of confounders. The rate of patients with adequate colon cleansing was higher in 1L-PEG than in 4L-PEG group (84.3% vs. 77.4%, p = 0.039). No different shift in serum concentration of electrolytes (namely Na+, K+, Ca2+), creatinine and hematocrit were observed for both preparations. Conclusion: We found a higher rate of adequate colon cleansing for colonoscopy with the 1L-PEG bowel prep vs. 4L-PEG, with apparent similar safety profile, among inpatients. A confirmatory randomized trial is needed. (ClinicalTrials.gov no: NCT04310332)
KW - High-volume PEG
KW - Hospitalized patients
KW - Safety
KW - Polyethylene glycol
KW - Low-volume PEG
KW - High-volume PEG
KW - Hospitalized patients
KW - Safety
KW - Polyethylene glycol
KW - Low-volume PEG
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10807/250917
U2 - 10.1016/j.dld.2020.10.006
DO - 10.1016/j.dld.2020.10.006
M3 - Article
SN - 1590-8658
VL - 52
SP - 1486
EP - 1493
JO - Digestive and Liver Disease
JF - Digestive and Liver Disease
ER -