123I-MIBG Radioaerosol lung clearance in COPD patients with fixed and partially reversible obstruction to evacuate the functional status of pulmonary adrenergic innervation

Raffaele Antonelli Incalzi, Alessandro Giordano, Leonello Fuso, Salvatore Basso, Maria Lucia Calcagni, Francesca Reale, Valeria Boniello, Riccardo Pistelli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In order to test the hypothesis that a greater sympathetic activity underlies partial reversibility of the bronchial obstruction in selected patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), we assessed the pulmonary clearance of inhaled I-meta-iodobenzylguanidine ( I-MIBG) radioaerosol in 10 patients with fixed and nine with reversible obstruction. The clearance of inhaled I-MIBG is known to be inversely related to I-MIBG uptake by adrenergic terminals. Groups were matched for age and judged free from confounding comorbidity. The penetration index did not distinguish between the groups (fixed obstruction, 97.39+/-14.59%; reversible obstruction, 89.09+/-19.95%; P=0.659); this excludes the possibility that the inequality of tracer penetration could affect I-MIBG clearance. The I-MIBG clearance was 140.92+/-7.67 min in patients with fixed obstruction and 151.08+/-31.54 min in patients with reversible obstruction ( P=0.604). In conclusion, COPD patients with fixed and reversible obstruction show comparable binding of the tracer to adrenergic pulmonary receptors. Thus, a greater receptor responsiveness or post-receptor mechanism probably underlies the partial reversibility of bronchial obstruction.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1217-1220
Number of pages4
JournalNuclear Medicine Communications
Publication statusPublished - 2002

Keywords

  • mibg
  • radioaereosol

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '123I-MIBG Radioaerosol lung clearance in COPD patients with fixed and partially reversible obstruction to evacuate the functional status of pulmonary adrenergic innervation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this